Standardizing the Definition of Each Colon Cancer Segment: Delphi Consensus on Clinical Decision-Making for Oncologic Outcomes ESTANDARIZACIÓN DE LA DEFINICIÓN DE CADA SEGMENTO DE CÁNCER DE COLON: CONSENSO DELPHI SOBRE LA TOMA DE DECISIONES CLÍNICAS PARA RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS


KUZU M. A., Benlice C., Parvaiz A., Gorgun E., Bertelsen C. A., Wexner S. D., ...Daha Fazla

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, cilt.68, sa.7, ss.835-844, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 68 Sayı: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003739
  • Dergi Adı: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, PASCAL, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.835-844
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Colon cancer segment classification, Definition, Delphi consensus, Localization
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

BACKGROUND: Data registries lack a definitive classification system that distinguishes different locations of colon cancer from one another. OBJECTIVE: To establish an international consensus on the definition of primary colon cancer segment locations. DESIGN: Between December 2022 and June 2023, the Delphi survey study was conducted to seek opinions from relevant international experts and eventually develop a consensus definition of each colon cancer segment. SETTING: Three-round online-based Delphi survey study. INTERVENTIONS: The online survey included 17 questions. In the first 2 rounds, participating experts were asked to rank each statement on a scale of 1 (least relevant) to 9 (most relevant). Consensus statements and definitions were revised according to the results for statements obtaining a consensus score of 7 to 9. During the third round and online meeting, definitions and statements that reached a moderate or high consensus (above 4 for more than 70% of participants) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary goal of our project was focused on precisely localizing the specific segment affected by primary colon cancer rather than identifying surgical treatment or type of resection needed for a particular segment. RESULTS: The first round included 331 experts; 301 (91%) completed the second round and 295 (98%) completed the final round. Experts strongly supported the use of a “10-cm rule” to describe colon cancer sites at the flexures and anatomical landmarks for other segments. Regarding the definition of rectosigmoid cancer, experts from United States and Europe reached a high consensus that the term rectosigmoid as a colon cancer location must be abolished in contrast to experts from Asia. The description of overlapping segments of cancers achieved a consensus of 64%. LIMITATIONS: Subjective decisions are based on individual expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey, the first internationally conducted consensus study, achieved a remarkable level of consensus among a panel of global experts. Ambiguity still exists regarding overlapping lesions. See Video Abstract.