Biomechanical and Parenchymal Determinants of Pain Perception During Mammography: Three-Dimensional Biometric Measurements and the Need for Personalized Compression
Diagnostics, cilt.16, sa.12, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 12
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/diagnostics16121819
- Dergi Adı: Diagnostics
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: BI-RADS, biomechanics, biometric measurement, breast density, mammography, pain, personalized compression
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background/Objectives: Standard mechanical compression applied during screening mammography is a primary barrier that reduces patient compliance. Current guidelines attempt to standardize compression based solely on the one-dimensional “breast thickness” measured by the device. This study aimed to investigate the effects of three-axis anatomical breast dimensions, applied compression force, menstrual cycle phases, and BI-RADS breast density patterns on pain scores during mammography within a comprehensive biomechanical model. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 443 female patients who underwent routine screening or diagnostic mammography. Patients with a history of breast implants, lactation, or prior breast surgery that could alter tissue biomechanics were excluded. Maximum pain scores (1–10 on a Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) were recorded. Transverse, anteroposterior, and superoinferior breast biometric measurements for each patient were calculated using advanced radiological workstations. Data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Multiple Linear Regression (OLS) models. Results: The mean age of the participants was 49.7 ± 9.4 years, the mean applied compression force was 62.4 ± 10.3 N, and the mean pain score was 2.03 ± 2.12 (range: 1–10). The multiple linear regression analysis was statistically significant overall (F = 2.516, p = 0.015). Having a BI-RADS Type D (extremely dense) breast pattern was identified as the strongest independent factor associated with an increased pain score (p = 0.082, coefficient = 1.219). Age showed a trend toward a negative effect on pain (p = 0.072), while compression force showed a trend toward a positive effect (p = 0.067). Conversely, breast thickness (p = 0.231) and the three-dimensional mean breast size index (p = 0.568) demonstrated no independent predictive power. The menstrual cycle phase did not reach independent significance in the multivariate regression model (p = 0.117); however, non-parametric univariate analysis revealed a significant difference in pain across hormonal groups (Kruskal–Wallis H = 10.04, p = 0.039), with actively menstruating and luteal-phase women reporting higher pain than menopausal women. Conclusions: The pain experienced during mammography depends on the internal fibroglandular architecture (elasticity and stiffness) of the tissue rather than its external volumetric dimensions. Notably, neither device-measured breast thickness nor manually calculated three-dimensional breast dimensions independently predicted pain, challenging the widespread assumption that breast size drives mammographic discomfort. “One-size-fits-all” or thickness-based compression strategies should be abandoned in routine practice. Instead, “personalized compression” protocols that prioritize patient comfort without compromising image quality should be developed, particularly for younger patients and those with BI-RADS Type D, and to a lesser extent Type C, density patterns.