Social Determinants of Healthcare Access: Horizontal Inequity in Rehabilitation Utilization and the Limits of Care in Mediating the Income-Depression Gradient in Türkiye
HEALTHCARE, cilt.14, sa.16, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 16
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/healthcare14162658
- Dergi Adı: HEALTHCARE
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, CINAHL, Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background/Objectives: Structural inequalities in access to healthcare persist even within systems that have achieved near-universal coverage, reflecting the enduring influence of social determinants of health on service utilization. This study examines horizontal inequity in rehabilitation and specialist care in T & uuml;rkiye and investigates whether access inequality mediates the well-documented income-depression gradient. Methods: Analyzing the nationally representative 2022 T & uuml;rkiye Health Survey (adults aged >= 15; N = 22,742), we employed Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to construct people-centered, multidimensional bodily burden profiles, and assessed need-adjusted access using survey-weighted logistic regression, Erreygers-corrected concentration-index decomposition, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), and restricted cubic splines, with measurement-invariance and classification-uncertainty sensitivity analyses. Statistical mediation was examined with natural-effect models and E-value sensitivity analysis. Results: Although the system demonstrated responsiveness to need-78.8% of the highest-burden profile accessed specialist services-only 13.7% of this same group reached dedicated physiotherapy or rehabilitation, revealing a profound structural bottleneck in care coordination for marginalized populations with the greatest functional impairment. A persistent pro-rich gradient was confirmed by an Erreygers-corrected concentration index of 0.058 (95% CI 0.043-0.072), driven additively by income and education. Access did not mediate the income-depression pathway (natural indirect effect OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0003-1.002). Conclusions: The mental health burden of low income operates through pathways that equitable healthcare access alone cannot address. These findings call for macroeconomic and people-centered health system reforms-including direct physiotherapy access, transportation subsidies, and social protection interventions-to advance health equity in rehabilitation utilization.