Effect of the reconstruction window obtained at the isovolumic relaxation period on the image quality in electrocardiographic-gated 16-multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography studies


KANTARCI A., Ceviz N., DURUR SUBAŞI I., Bayraktutan U., KARAMAN A., ALPER F., ...Daha Fazla

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, cilt.30, sa.2, ss.258-261, 2006 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 30 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2006
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/00004728-200603000-00017
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.258-261
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Objective: To evaluate whether images obtained during the reconstruction window responding to the isovolumic relaxation period could be used for rapid and easy postprocessing. Methods: One hundred ten consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease who had previously had a multidetector Computed tomography (MDCT) scan for imaging coronary arteries were enrolled in this study. The age of the patients was 59 +/- 13 years (range: 33-78 years), and 77 (70%) were male. Multidetector computed tomography was performed on a 16-detector-row computed tomography scanner during I breath hold (16-24 seconds). Seven different sets of images reconstructed at every 10% of the R-R interval from 30% to 90% for contrast-enhanced scans at levels containing the first several centimeters of the left and right coronary arteries were analyzed. The best of these reconstruction windows were then compared with the images reconstructed at the isovolumic relaxation period, which is the last portion of the T wave at the end of the systole, where there is not any change in ventricular volume, which causes stepladder artifacts. The step artifact was classified as excellent, good, or poor. Image quality was assessed by 2 radiologists who were not aware of each other's interpretation. Results: According to the routinely used reconstructions, there were 76 patients with excellent image quality, 28 with good image quality, and 6 with poor image quality. For the period of isovolumic relaxation, there were 74 patients with excellent image quality, 25 with good image quality, and I I with poor image quality. Conclusion: If one begins image analysis with the isovolumic relaxation period reconstruction window, spending less time for postprocessing analyses, good image quality can be obtained such as with other good reconstruction windows.