THE OUTCOMES OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE PROTOCOLS DURING DIFFERENT PHASES OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS


Ruhı C.

17th BANTAO Congress, Antalya, Türkiye, 10 - 13 Kasım 2022, ss.27

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Antalya
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.27
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: After the beginning of the  Covid-19 pandemia due to initial reports of high mortality in patients with multiple comorbidities, ESRD and chronic immunosuppressive kidney transplant patients almost all transplant centers develop different immunosuppressive protocols according to their experience. In this study we revealed the outcomes of our alternative immunosuppressive  protocols during the different phases of Covid-19 pandemic.

Method: In the first phase of Covid-19 due to high mortality risk of dominant variants until December 2021;the protocol was increased dose prednisolone (20mg/day) and complete cessation of calcineurin and MMF, when the dominant variant became Omicron in the second phase, prednisolone 20mg/day, 50% dose reduction of tacrolimus and MMF cessation were applied. The data were evaluated retrospectively in terms of mortality, biopsy-proven rejection, allograft loss, and allograft functions.

 

Results: From the 592 follow-up patients of our center, 132 of them (13.2%)  were infected with Covid-19. In the first phase, Covid-19 infection developed in 108 patients (mean age 47.07±12.9 years, 54.6% male, 49% one comorbidity, 9.3% three comorbidities). The mortality rate was 10.2%, Biopsy proven rejection was 3.7%, need of  RRT was 1.9%, and allograft loss was 0.9%. Allograft functions of the patients were well preserved (64ml/min vs. 67.4ml/min GFR, 312.3±766.2mg/dl vs. 435.74±1302mg/dl proteinuria, p=NS).

In the second phase of Covid-19 infection, 24 patients were infected (mean age 47±12.98 years, 45.8% male, 46% one comorbidity, 8.3% three comorbidities). Mortality was detected in only one of these patients (4.2%), while biopsy-proven rejection and temporary RRT were required in one patient (4.2%), allograft loss did not occur. Allograft functions of the patients were well preserved (60ml/min vs. 63.1ml/min GFR, 211.5±366.2mg/dl vs. 116.29±176 mg/dl proteinuria, p=NS)

 

Conclusion: In the first phase of Covid-19, with aggressive immunosuppressive reduction, lower mortality was achieved in kidney transplant patients than generally reported, while no significant problems were experienced in terms of allograft function and survival. In the second phase, which had a milder course, severe patient and allograft protection could be achieved with moderate immunosuppressive dose reduction.