The 2026 ESSKA-ESA formal consensus on partial-thickness posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (Part 2): Treatment strategies, rehabilitation, return to sport and complications


Kany J., Iban M. R., Calvo E., Rosso C., Peach C., Dias C. M., ...Daha Fazla

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1002/ksa.70622
  • Dergi Adı: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SportDiscus, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Pharma Collection (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: formal consensus, partial-thickness rotator cuff tear, rehabilitation, return to sport, treatment strategies
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: To establish evidence-based consensus recommendations for the management of partial-thickness posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PT-PS-RCTs). This second part addresses treatment strategies, rehabilitation, return to sport and complications. Methods: This European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy–European Shoulder Associates (ESSKA-ESA) Formal Consensus was conducted according to the ESSKA Formal Consensus Methodology. A Steering Group (13 shoulder surgeons) developed 33 questions and statements based on a standardized literature review and assigned recommendation grades (A–D) according to the level of evidence. Statements were evaluated by an independent Rating Group (20 shoulder surgeons) through a three-round consensus process. Results: Twenty-one Question–Statement (Q–S) pairs achieved strong agreement, generating 30 individual recommendations (1 Grade A, 6 Grade B, 10 Grade C and 13 Grade D). Grade A evidence identified an increased risk of postoperative stiffness after trans-tendon repair of articular-sided PT-PS-RCTs compared with tear completion. Grade B evidence supported conservative treatment for at least 6 months, platelet-rich plasma injections and management of stiffness before surgery; both trans-tendon/in-situ repair and tear-completion-and-repair showed similar return-to-sport rates, although tear-completion-and-repair had slightly higher retear rates. The most commonly reported patient-reported outcome measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant–Murley and visual analogue scale scores. Conclusion: Management should be individualized according to patient characteristics (activity level, sports participation), symptoms, tear morphology and tissue quality rather than based on a single treatment algorithm. Non-surgical treatment is the preferred initial approach, whereas no surgical technique has demonstrated consistent superiority across all clinical scenarios. These recommendations provide clinicians with a practical framework to guide treatment decisions and standardize the management of PT-PS-RCTs in daily clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level I, formal consensus.