Long-Term Outcomes of Left versus Right Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy with Multiple Renal Arteries


Creative Commons License

Karayagiz A. H., Besli S., Yilmaz G., Ozdemir E., ÇAKIR Ü., BERBER İ.

European Surgical Research, cilt.63, sa.1, ss.46-54, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 63 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1159/000522315
  • Dergi Adı: European Surgical Research
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.46-54
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Graft survival, Kidney transplantation, Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Long-term outcomes, Renal artery
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the long-term graft outcomes of left-versus-right donor nephrectomy with multiple renal arteries (MRAs), and therefore creating a reference for the expansion of the potential living kidney donor pool. Methods: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy cases between May 2010 and October 2020 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. The data relating to donor and recipient demographics, surgical and anatomical characteristics, recipient, and graft status were retrieved and compared using nonparametric statistical methods and multivariate regression. Analyses were fit for survival factors. Results: A total of 1,009 recipients were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study with their donors. 16.7% of the donors had been discovered to have more than one renal artery supplying the donated kidney. The acute rejection rate was 12.8%. Death-censored graft survival at postoperative year 5 for single renal artery (SRA) transplants was 89.6%, 89.5% for left-sided MRAs, and 88.2% for right-sided ones. Conclusions: Both right donor nephrectomy and left donor nephrectomy are safe procedures with no significant negatively impacted rates for neither survival nor complications of the recipients in the long-term, compared to SRA ones.