Rapid identification of Helicobacter pylori and assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility from clinical specimens using FISH


DEMİRAY GÜRBÜZ E., YILMAZ Ö., Olivares A. Z. , GÖNEN C. , SARIOĞLU S., SOYTÜRK M., ...More

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH, vol.3, no.1, pp.29-37, 2017 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 3 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2017
  • Doi Number: 10.1002/cjp2.57
  • Title of Journal : JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH
  • Page Numbers: pp.29-37
  • Keywords: clarithromycin resistance, FISH, H. pylori detection, IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION, UREASE-POSITIVE BACTERIA, RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENE, ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE, MACROLIDE RESISTANCE, GASTRIC BIOPSIES, CAGA PROTEIN, DOMAIN-V, INFECTION, ERADICATION

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori remains one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide. Clarithromycin resistance is the most important cause of H. pylori eradication failures. Effective antibiotic therapies in H. pylori infection must be rapidly adapted to local resistance patterns. We investigated the prevalence of clarithromycin resistance due to mutations in positions 2142 and 2143 of 23SrRNA gene of H. pylori by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and compared with culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 234 adult patients with dyspepsia who were enrolled. Antrum and corpus biopsy specimens were obtained for rapid urease test, histopathology and culture. Epsilometer test was used to assess clarithromycin susceptibility. H. pylori presence and clarithromycin susceptibility were determined by FISH in paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens. We found that 164 (70.1%) patients were positive for H. pylori based on clinical criteria, 114 (69.5% CI 62.5-76.6%) were culture positive, and 137 (83.5% CI 77.8-89.2%) were FISH positive. Thus the sensitivity of FISH was significantly superior to that of culture. However specificity was not significantly different (91.4 versus 100.0%, respectively). The resistance rate to clarithromycin for both antrum and corpus was detected in H. pylori-positive patients; 20.2% by FISH and 28.0% by E-test. The concordance between E-test and FISH was only 89.5% due to the presence of point mutations different from A2143G, A2142G or A2142C. We conclude that FISH is significantly more sensitive than culture and the E-test for the detection of H. pylori and for rapid determinination of claritromycin susceptibility. The superior hybridisation efficiency of FISH is becoming an emerging molecular tool as a reliable, rapid and sensitive method for the detection and visualisation of H. pylori, especially when the management of H. pylori eradication therapy is necessary. This is particularly important for the treatment of patients with H. pylori eradication failure.