The PAPAS index: a novel index for the prediction of hepatitis C-related fibrosis


Ozel B. D. , POYRAZOĞLU O. K. , Karaman A. , Karaman H., Altinkaya E., Sevinc E., et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, cilt.27, ss.895-900, 2015 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi)

  • Cilt numarası: 27 Konu: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2015
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000379
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
  • Sayfa Sayısı: ss.895-900

Özet

BackgroundSeveral noninvasive tests have been developed to determine the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) without performing liver biopsy.AimThis study aimed to determine the performance of the PAPAS (Platelet/Age/Phosphatase/AFP/AST) index in patients with CHC for the prediction of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis and to compare it with other noninvasive tests. To date, no study has evaluated the application of the PAPAS index in CHC-associated liver fibrosis.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 137 consecutive patients with CHC who had undergone a percutaneous liver biopsy before treatment. The aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio (APRI), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine transaminase ratio (AAR), age-platelet index (API), FIB4, cirrhosis discriminate score (CDS), the Goteborg University cirrhosis index (GUCI), and PAPAS were calculated and compared with the diagnostic accuracies of all fibrosis indices between the groups F0-F2 (no-mild fibrosis) versus F3-F6 (significant fibrosis) and F0-F4 (no cirrhosis) versus F5-F6 (cirrhosis).ResultsTo predict significant fibrosis, the area under curve (95% confidence interval) for FIB4 was 0.727 followed by GUCI (0.721), PAPAS approximate to APRI approximate to CDS (0.716), and API (0.68). To predict cirrhosis, the area under curve (95% confidence interval) for FIB4 was calculated to be 0.735, followed by GUCI (0.723), PAPAS approximate to APRI approximate to CDS approximate to(0.71), and API (0.66). No statistically significant difference was observed among these predictors to exclude both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis (P>0.05).ConclusionThe diagnostic capability of the PAPAS index has moderate efficiency and was not superior to other fibrosis markers for the identification of fibrosis in CHC patients. There is a need for more comprehensive prospective studies to help determine the diagnostic value of PAPAS for liver fibrosis. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.