Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer


Dincer N., Ugurluer G., Mustafayev T. Z., Serkizyan A., Aydin G., Güngör G., ...Daha Fazla

BRACHYTHERAPY, cilt.23, sa.1, ss.18-24, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 23 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.09.007
  • Dergi Adı: BRACHYTHERAPY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.18-24
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cervical cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging-guided, Stereotactic body radiotherapy
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

PURPOSE: The standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by high -dose -rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Although previous studies compared HDR-BT with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), there is scarce data regarding the dosimetric outcomes of stereotactic MR -guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) boost in lieu of HDR-BT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this single -institutional in-silico comparative study, LACC patients who were definitively treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by HDR-BT were selected. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated in MRI and HDR-planning CT. An HDR-BT and a SMART boost plan were generated with a prescribed dose of 28 Gy in four fractions for all patients. The HDR-BT and SMART boost plans were compared in regard to target coverage as well OARs doses. RESULTS: Mean EQD2 D90 to HR-CTV and IR-CTV for HDR-BT plans were 89.7 and 70.5 Gy, respectively. For SMART, the mean EQD2 D90 to HR -PTV, HR-CTV, and IR-CTV were 82.9, 95.4, and 70.2 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for HDR-BT plans were 86.4, 70.7, and 65.7 Gy, respectively. The mean D2cc EQD2 of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon for SMART plans were 81.4, 70.8, and 73.6 Gy, respectively. All dose constraints in terms of target coverage and OARs constraints were met for both HDR-BT and SMART plans. CONCLUSIONS: This dosimetric study demonstrates that SMART can be applied in cases where HDR-BT is not available or ineligible with acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing. However, prospective clinical studies are needed to validate these results. (c) 2023 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.