Comparison of two different measurement methods to determine glenoid bone defects: area or width?

Altan, Egemen; Ozbaydar, MEHMET; TONBUL, MURAT; Yalcin, Levent

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.029

Comparison of two different measurement methods to determine glenoid bone defects: area or width?

Altan E., Ozbaydar M. U., TONBUL M., Yalcin L.

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, cilt.23, sa.8, ss.1215-1222, 2014 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 23 Sayı: 8
Basım Tarihi: 2014
Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.029
Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1215-1222
Anahtar Kelimeler: Glenoid bone loss, instability, glenoid index, arthroscopy, shoulder, Pico method, RECURRENT ANTERIOR DISLOCATION, SHOULDER INSTABILITY, GLENOHUMERAL JOINT, BARE SPOT, CT, ARTHROSCOPY, CAVITY
Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: This study compared two different techniques that have been used to measure the glenoids of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation.