Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with basal insulin: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of non-Asian studies


Home P., Lauand F., Djaballah K., Li X., Hafidh K., Mehta R., ...More

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol.27, no.6, pp.3410-3418, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 27 Issue: 6
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.1111/dom.16360
  • Journal Name: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Page Numbers: pp.3410-3418
  • Keywords: fixed-ratio combination, iGlarLixi, insulin therapy, network meta-analysis, type 2 diabetes
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the relative treatment effect of iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide) versus premixed insulin IDegAsp (insulin degludec plus insulin aspart) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who advanced from basal insulin to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp in non-Asian studies. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a systematic review by searching Embase (including congress abstracts from 2021 to 2023), MEDLINE® and CENTRAL on 10 October 2023. Treatment outcomes from non-Asian RCTs for people with T2D previously treated with basal insulin, who switched to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp, were compared using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Data analysis was performed using R, version 4.0.2. Results: The NMA included four RCTs (N = 2535). The results of the NMA showed that iGlarLixi (n = 810) was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c versus IDegAsp (n = 454) (mean difference [MD]: −0.39 [95% credible interval, CrI: −0.58, −0.21] %-units). iGlarLixi was also associated with a significantly greater likelihood of achieving an HbA1c of <7.0% (risk ratio: 1.42, 95% CrI: 1.18, 1.71). A greater reduction in postprandial glucose was observed with iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp (MD: −1.38 [95% CrI: −2.15, −0.63] mmol/L). A body weight benefit that favoured iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp was documented (MD: −1.54 [95% CrI: −2.26, −0.84] kg). Hypoglycaemia evaluation was inconclusive due to definitional differences between trials. Conclusions: Once-daily iGlarLixi was associated with superior blood glucose control and body weight benefit compared with IDegAsp in insulin-experienced populations with T2D in non-Asian RCTs.