Can Supine Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging After a Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provide Information for Supine Procedures?


Kus C. C., Guldogan N., Yilmaz E., Soyder A., Arslan A., Arıbal M. E.

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, sa.4, ss.561-568, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001461
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.561-568
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

PurposeThe aim of the study is to compare prone with supine breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of breast tumor location, size, shape, and tumor-to-tumor distances in multifocal lesions to improve image-based guidance for surgical planning.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 75 lesions in 50 patients with pathologically proven breast cancer who underwent MRI in prone and supine positions between December 2019 and December 2020. The transverse, anteroposterior, and craniocaudal dimensions (in millimeters) of the tumor in the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured. Distances from the center of the tumor to the chest wall and the adjacent skin were measured on transverse and reformatted sagittal images. In cases where multifocal lesions were present, the transverse, anteroposterior, and craniocaudal distances between the tumor centers in the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured. Differences between measurements in supine and prone MRI were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U and the Wilcoxon tests. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.ResultsThe analysis revealed 31 MRIs with 1 and 20 with multifocal lesions. The x-axis dimension of the lesions in prone and supine positions did not significantly differ (P = 0.198) between the 2 positions. A significant difference in the y- and z-axes dimensions was observed between the prone and supine position (P = 0.00 for both). The distance from the tumor to the chest wall and the adjacent skin showed significant difference (P = 0.00 for both). For multifocal lesions, the distance between the lesions showed a significant difference on the y-axis (P = 0.00).ConclusionsThis study showed a significant difference in the tumor size, location, and tumor-to-tumor distances due to change of patient position, from the standard prone MRI to the supine position in the operating room, resulting in distortion, spatial repositioning, and convergence of the lesions. Supine MRI may be considered in providing a less extensive surgery.