Differences in Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment and Outcomes for Distal, Mid-, Proximal, or Multiple Ureteral Locations: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

Perez Castro, Enrique; Osther, Palle; Jinga, Viorel; Razvi, Hassan; Stravodimos, Konstantinos; Parikh, Kandarp; Kural, ALİ; de la Rosette, Jean

doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011

Differences in Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment and Outcomes for Distal, Mid-, Proximal, or Multiple Ureteral Locations: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

Perez Castro E., Osther P. J. S., Jinga V., Razvi H., Stravodimos K. G., Parikh K., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN UROLOGY, cilt.66, sa.1, ss.102-109, 2014 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 66 Sayı: 1
Basım Tarihi: 2014
Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011
Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.102-109
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ureteroscopy, Ureteral stones, Treatment outcome, Complications, SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY, COMPLICATIONS, CALCULI, INSTRUMENTS, MANAGEMENT
Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: Ureteroscopy has traditionally been the preferred approach for treatment of distal and midureteral stones, with shock wave lithotripsy used for proximal ureteral stones.