Differences in Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment and Outcomes for Distal, Mid-, Proximal, or Multiple Ureteral Locations: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study

Perez Castro E., Osther P. J. S., Jinga V., Razvi H., Stravodimos K. G., Parikh K., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN UROLOGY, cilt.66, sa.1, ss.102-109, 2014 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 66 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2014
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN UROLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.102-109
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Ureteroscopy, Ureteral stones, Treatment outcome, Complications, SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY, COMPLICATIONS, CALCULI, INSTRUMENTS, MANAGEMENT
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: Ureteroscopy has traditionally been the preferred approach for treatment of distal and midureteral stones, with shock wave lithotripsy used for proximal ureteral stones.