Impact of intestinal ultrasound with a portable system in the management of Crohn's disease.


Gonen C., Surmelioglu A., Kochan K., Ozer S., Aslan E., Tilki M.

Gastroenterology report, cilt.9, sa.5, ss.418-426, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 9 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/gastro/goaa088
  • Dergi Adı: Gastroenterology report
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.418-426
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel diseases, point-of-care, portable, ultrasound, monitoring, C-REACTIVE PROTEIN, ENDOSCOPIC ACTIVITY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIAGNOSIS, POINT
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a valid cross-sectional imaging technique for the evaluation of Crohn’s disease (CD). With advancements in technology, portable ultrasound systems are becoming widely available, and the inevitable change to their use by non-radiologist clinicians would be a valuable contribution to improving patient care. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of IUS examination performed by a gastroenterologist with a portable system as an adjunct imaging modality in the routine care of CD patients.

Methods

A total of 117 CD patients were assessed by IUS imaging. Pre- and post-IUS clinical-management decisions were recorded. The primary outcome was to evaluate the change in the patients’ clinical-management decision following the IUS examination. The diagnostic accuracy was compared against the reference decision reached via a multidisiplinary meeting after the evaluation of all patient-related data. The endoscopic disease activity was determined using the simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD).

Results

The initial clinical-management decision was changed in 47 patients (40.2%) after the IUS examination (P = 0.001). The accuracy of patient-management decisions improved from 63.2% to 90.6% in comparison to reference decisions (P < 0.001). After IUS examination, a further 13 cases (11.1%) were identified for urgent surgical/interventional procedures. The accuracy of colonoscopic (SES-CD ≥3) assessment was shown to be comparable to that of IUS (94% vs 91%). The sensitivity for disease presence was 95% with colonoscopy and 94% with the IUS assessment.

Conclusion

IUS examination with the use of a portable ultrasonography system significantly improves clinical-management decisions. With further supporting data, this practice would possibly become a requirement for CD management.