Detection of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae directly from positive blood cultures by the Rapid Polymyxin NP test


Ayaş M.

28th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Madrid, İspanya, 21 - 24 Nisan 2018, ss.136, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Madrid
  • Basıldığı Ülke: İspanya
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.136
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: Broth microdilution is considered as the only reliable method to determine the colistin

susceptibility, however it's time consuming and laborious and thus, cannot be used widely in routine

laboratories. The recently developed "rapid polymyxin NP test" (RPNPT) provides an easy and rapid

alternative to distinguish between colistin-susceptible and -resistant strains. In this study, the

performance of RPNPT for the detection of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae directly from

positive blood cultures was evaluated.

Materials/methods: RPNPT was first performed for 19 spiked blood culture sets (BacT/ALERT,

bioMérieux) each including 3 mL (103 CFU/mL) suspension of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriacae

isolates (range of colistin MIC: 8 - >128 mg/L). Following the signal, 50 μl from a positive blood culture

was withdrawn, diluted 1:10 and 50 μl of this dilution was used to perform the RPNPT as originally

described by Nordmann et al. in 2016. Secondly, for a period of three months, positive blood cultures

demonstrating the growth of Gram-negative bacilli were subjected to rapid identification by running

MALDI-TOF MS after inoculation and 3-hour incubation on chocolate agar. Cultures yielding

monobacterial growth of an Enterobacteriaceae isolate (n=59) were included in the prospective

evaluation study and the RPNPT was performed from the positive blood cultures immediately following

identification. The colistin MIC values of isolates in the prospective study were determined by broth

microdilution method.

Results: Colistin resistance in all 19 colistin-resistant strains was detected with the RPNPT in 2–4

hours. Among the clinical isolates included in the prospective study, four Klebsiella pneumoniae

strains were detected as resistant to colistin by RPNPT and the resistance was confirmed with colistin

MIC values ranging between 4–16 mg/L. The remaining samples (n=55) were detected as negative by

RPNPT and colistin MIC values were found in the susceptible range (0.125–0.5 mg/L).

Conclusions: Our results indicate that RPNPT can distinguish between colistin-resistant and

susceptible Enterobacteriaceae strains directly from positive blood cultures within 4 hours with 100%

sensitivity and specificity. The use of RPNPT together with rapid identification methods such as

MALDI-TOF MS, might produce same-day results and prevent the inappropriate use of colistin by

rapid detection of colistin-resistant strains.