Deniz, F. E. Et Al. 2012. Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings. NEUROSURGERY , vol.70, no.3 , 610-616.

Deniz, F. E., Oksuz, E., Sarikaya, B., Kurt, S., Erkorkmaz, U., Ulusoy, H., ... Arslan, Ş.(2012). Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings. NEUROSURGERY , vol.70, no.3, 610-616.

Deniz, Fatih Et Al. "Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings," NEUROSURGERY , vol.70, no.3, 610-616, 2012

Deniz, Fatih E. Et Al. "Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings." NEUROSURGERY , vol.70, no.3, pp.610-616, 2012

Deniz, F. E. Et Al. (2012) . "Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings." NEUROSURGERY , vol.70, no.3, pp.610-616.

@article{article, author={Fatih Ersay Deniz Et Al. }, title={Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Electromyography, Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Determined by Clinical Findings}, journal={NEUROSURGERY}, year=2012, pages={610-616} }